Medical & Healthcare

Before any model reasons, the companion builds the brief with you. Patient profile. Therapeutic context. Regulatory jurisdiction. Level of evidence required. You approve it. The deliberation starts from your clinical reality.

• ·PubMed — peer-reviewed biomedical literature
• ·Cochrane Reviews — systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• ·ClinicalTrials.gov — active and completed trial data
• ·WHO — international clinical guidelines
• ·EMA — EU drug approvals and safety alerts
• ·NICE — UK clinical guidelines
• ·HAS — French health authority recommendations
• ·FDA — drug approvals and safety communications
• ·bioRxiv / medRxiv — emerging research

Every claim carries a provenance tag. [SOURCED] means traced to a verified reference. [INFERRED] means analytical inference — flagged automatically.

• The Architect maps the clinical pathway and protocol feasibility.
• The Strategist reads epidemiological signals and treatment landscape trends.
• The Engineer examines biological feasibility and methodology rigor.
• The Counsel surfaces regulatory exposure, liability, and patient safety obligations.
• The Contrarian sole mandate: challenge every clinical assumption and every study cited.

Five complete analyses. Five distinct angles. Not five versions of the same answer. Then they challenge each other — anonymously. Then they converge.

Output: GO / PIVOT / NO GO / INSUFFICIENT BASIS · Confidence score · Decision matrix · Minority Report · Testable predictions.

Questions Pilot5.ai helps with

• What does the evidence say about this treatment for this patient profile?
• Should we adopt this protocol given the latest Phase III data?
• How do HAS and NICE guidelines differ on this indication?
• Our trial has a design flaw. Should we proceed to publication?

Common questions

How does this handle patient confidentiality?

Clinical content is never used to train any AI model. A pseudonymization layer replaces personal identifiers with reversible tokens before anything reaches a model, and restores them only in your result — automated detection reduces what reaches a provider, though it cannot guarantee elimination. Each deliberation leaves a timestamped record you can retrieve by ID. Retention periods and Zero Data Retention mode are set out in our Privacy Policy.

Does it replace clinical judgment or a specialist opinion?

No. Pilot5.ai does not provide medical advice and is not a diagnostic device. It sets out the competing readings of the evidence, including the one that cuts against the consensus, so the clinician deciding has seen the objection before acting on it.

How does it fit a clinical or committee workflow?

The brief is assembled with you and shown before anything runs, the cost estimate with it, and the output arrives as a structured recommendation with a confidence score and a preserved dissent — a document a committee can read and minute. Current rates are on the pricing page.